The hazards of interrupting anticoagulation therapy in atrial fibrillation.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly encountered clinical arrhythmia and is associated with a substantial burden of morbidity (mainly thrombo-embolism) and mortality. Vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin are highly effective for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with AF, but their use is hampered by multiple food and drug interactions, the need for routine coagulation monitoring, and a high risk of bleeding complications. Hence warfarin not only is underutilized, but among those who are prescribed warfarin the treatment is frequently interrupted or permanently discontinued. No large studies have explored the possible impact of stopping warfarin on the short-term risk of subsequent major adverse cardiovascular outcomes, such as stroke and death, in patients with AF. Raunsø and co-workers have now reported the results of a Danish nationwide retrospective cohort study in which they explored outcomes after warfarin interruption in patients with AF. Patients with a first hospitalization for AF in the period 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2008 were identified using the Danish National Patient Registry, and warfarin interruption was determined by cross-linkage with prescription claims from the Danish Registry of Medicinal Product Statistics. The primary outcome of the study was hospitalization for thrombo-embolism (ischaemic stroke, transient ischaemic attack, or unspecified stroke), pulmonary embolism or systemic arterial embolism, or allcause death. Among 149 151 patients with a first hospitalization for AF during the 12 year study period, 48 989 filled a prescription for warfarin a median of 6 days after being discharged from hospital. Remarkably, 35 396 patients or 72% of the entire cohort had at least one warfarin treatment interruption during a mean of 3.5 years of followup. The median age for patients receiving warfarin was 71 years, the median CHADS2 score was 1.41, and the overall incidence rate of thrombo-embolism or death was 6.9 per 100 patient years. One-half of these events occurred during treatment interruption, and the incidence rate of thrombo-embolism or death during the first 90 days after stopping warfarin was 31.6 per 100 patient years. The strengths of the report by Raunsø et al. are the inclusion of an unselected ‘real-life’ AF population, the long follow-up duration, and the use of a robust primary outcome measure, hospitalization for thrombo-embolism and all-cause death. The study also has several limitations, including lack of information on bleeding, uncertainty about the accuracy of warfarin dosing estimations (which may have led to error in estimating the timing of warfarin interruption), and inability to distinguish temporary from permanent interruption. The most important limitation would appear to be lack of information concerning the reason for warfarin interruption, which complicates interpretation of the association between treatment interruption and outcome. Potential explanations for the findings of an association between treatment interruption and risk of thrombo-embolism or death are illustrated in Figure 1. One possible explanation is that the event that prompted the treatment interruption (e.g. bleeding, trauma, or surgery) might also have been the cause of thrombo-embolism or death (‘confounding’). Without detailed information on the reason for interruption, the potential for confounding cannot be excluded. A second possible explanation is that the events that occurred during interruption of warfarin simply reflect loss of protection against thrombo-embolism in patients with persistent risk factors (‘indirectly causal’). However, this explanation cannot account for the very high rate of thrombo-embolism or death observed during the first 90 days because patients who underwent warfarin interruption had a mean CHADS2 score of 1.34 which, if untreated, is associated with an annual risk of stroke of ,5%. A third possible explanation is that warfarin interruption is associated with rebound hypercoagulability that increases the risk of thrombo-embolism (‘directly causal’). Warfarin prevents thrombosis by inhibiting synthesis of vitamin K-dependent coagulation proteins, thereby preventing thrombin generation. Withdrawal of
منابع مشابه
فرآیند درمانی فیبریلاسیون دهلیزی در بیمارستان های ایران
Background: Lack of attention to standardized guidelines has caused tragic outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation and ultimately increase of financial burden imposed on the community structure of the economic system. Therefore, the present study was aimed to assess the exposure of patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods: A total of 506 patients with atrial fibrillation were...
متن کاملAssociations between anticoagulation therapy and risks of mortality and readmission among patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND Patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation are at higher risk of thromboembolic events than patients with heart failure alone. Yet, the use of anticoagulation therapy varies in clinical practice, especially among older patients, for whom its effectiveness is poorly understood. METHODS AND RESULTS Using clinical registry data linked to Medicare claims from 2005 to 2011, we ...
متن کاملAnticoagulation and population risk of stroke and death in incident atrial fibrillation: a population-based cohort study.
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation increases the risk of stroke and death. Anticoagulation therapy is an effective treatment for stroke prevention, but remains underused in the community. We sought to determine the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy in an inception cohort with new-onset atrial fibrillation in the province of Alberta, Canada. METHODS We conducted a population-base...
متن کاملA Semi-Automated Algorithm for Segmentation of the Left Atrial Appendage Landing Zone: Application in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Procedures
Background: Mechanical occlusion of the Left atrial appendage (LAA) using a purpose-built device has emerged as an effective prophylactic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke and a contraindication for anticoagulation. A crucial step in procedural planning is the choice of the device size. This is currently based on the manual analysis of the “Device Landing Zone” fr...
متن کاملAtrial Fibrillation Ablation without Interruption of Anticoagulation
Atrial fibrillation (AF) can be cured by pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) in a substantial proportion of patients. The high efficacy of PVAI is partially undermined by a small but concrete periprocedural risk of complications, such as thromboembolic events and bleeding. A correct management of anticoagulation is essential to prevent such complications. Performing PVAI without interruption...
متن کاملFall risk and anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in the elderly: A delicate balance.
Guidelines for managing atrial fibrillation recommend systemic anticoagulation for almost all patients age 65 and older, but in practice up to 50% of older patients do not receive maintenance anticoagulation therapy. The most common reason physicians cite for withholding anticoagulation in older patients with atrial fibrillation is a perception of a high risk of falling and associated bleeding,...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- European heart journal
دوره 33 15 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012